![]() ![]() The approach presented in this paper can be also followed for the (re)evaluation of flight training schemes in military, civil and general aviation, as well by any human-machine interface intensive domain.Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 13:01:42 Boxid IA40016719 Camera Sony Alpha-A6300 (Control) Collection_set printdisabled External-identifier The analysis lead to recommendations in regard to the amendment of the corresponding fighter pilots training program, and the conduction of further research regarding the aircraft – pilot interaction when multiple safety constraints are violated. The results demonstrated the benefits of the STPA method, the application of which uncovered various inadequacies in the flight training program studied, some of them related to the F-16 cockpit ergonomics. The analysis showed that: the flight training program under study does not structurally include cases of infringement of multiple safety constraints the maintenance of some safety constraints are not supported by alerts, or rely on only one human sense the existing procedures do not refer to the prioritization of pilot actions in cases of violation of multiple safety constraints operation manuals do not address the cases of possible human performance deterioration when simultaneous information from feedback mechanisms is received. We compared the results of each analysis step with the respective flight training program, which is based on a mixed skill and rule-based decision making, and we examined the role of the feedback mechanisms during multiple safety constraints violations. In this context, we derived the control actions and feedback mechanisms that are available to the leader pilot during an Aircraft Combat Maneuver (cm) mission, and we developed the control flow diagram based on the aircraft manuals. We applied the STPA method by considering the safety constraints documented in the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of a South European Air Force and regard a flight of a two F-16 aircraft formation. This paper presents how the application of the STPA method might support the evaluation of fighter pilots training programs and trigger procedural and technological changes. ![]() Eleven of the performance criteria are within the scope of this paper however, the proposed system provides an extensible infrastructure to define new criteria and parameters. The evaluation of the trainees is conducted at the end of the flight and then a report related to the trainees' performance is generated. Secondly, a dynamic pilot performance evaluation system is developed that can be controlled and modified by experienced instructor pilots (instructors/trainers) to define the performance criteria details by using predefined evaluation parameters. ![]() First, the evaluation criteria for the pilot performance are defined. In this paper, the details of the framework which is developed to analyze and evaluate the performance of the trainees is introduced. In general, an ACSS consists of the following stages: planning the scenario, training, flight analysis, and the performance evaluation. "Air Combat Simulation Systems" (ACSS) are developed to train fighter pilots (trainees) in a virtual combat environment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |